Wednesday, 2 May 2018

Election Time

Hello everyone!

It's been a while since I've written anything on here and to be fair it's been a combination of being fully consumed with another project and not having the time to spend that it takes to be aware of everything going on in the area around Worcester Park.

The other project (for those interested) is my rock band Denzeity which has been taking up all my spare time for over a year now. We may have a gig coming up at the Royal British Legion in July so keep your eyes open...

Anyway, given it's a council election, it's probably high time I at least made contact, climbed onto my soapbox and had a little rant about what been going on in the local area recently. And as anyone local will agree, all has not been well.

#SuttonBinShame is of course the issues that has dominated the entire borough for the last 2 years. Additionally numerous local problems that the existing Lib Dem council has been promising to sort out for aeons but have just been left to fester for as long as anyone can remember.

It would be utter madness to re-elect yet more Lib Dems when there are so many other good candidates from other parties ready to step up and take responsibility for sorting out the mess we are in.

Many blog readers were probably assuming I would be standing as a candidate myself in Worcester Park (as I have done before) but I have not had the time recently to dedicate to Worcester Park and it would not be right to ask people to give me responsibility for the local area if I can't dedicate the time to do so.

Speaking of which, regular readers will be aware that I have been involved in the minutia of Worcester Park issues for many years. Indeed I was proud to be asked to chair the Worcester Park residents' association (a non political organisation) in 2015 and then re-elected to the position in 2016. So I'd say I have known every stalwart, mover, shaker and community active person in Worcester Park for the last several years.

Why then are the three grinning faces in the 'Focus' election leaflets so unfamiliar to me? Whilst in 2014 I was standing against Lib Dems Arthur Hookway and Richard Marston - at least they were local and had done stuff in the local community. This year the Lib Dems seem to be putting up people who would struggle to tell the difference between Beverley Road and Beverley Gardens - (one runs between Ruskin Drive and Colborne Way, the other runs off Green Lane - in case you were wondering). It seems the party that has done such damage to the local area is finally unable to find any suitable new candidates who either live in the ward or have any history of local community service what-so-ever.

So who would I recommend for Worcester Park ward? Well given that I'm not standing in Worcester Park this time round I don't need to say please vote for me. I can however say that the best way to avoid yet four more years of Lib Dem incompetence (including councillors who know nothing about the local area) is to vote for the three Conservatives standing in Worcester Park: Tom Drummond, Bob Mian and Paul Newman. Knowing them personally I can say that as well as being really decent people, they are all dedicated to making the changes necessary to sort out the problems in the local area. I have been out knocking on doors with them several times and hearing them engage with local people I know they will all do an outstanding job and work extremely hard as local councillors. (Paul Newman has been a councillor in the area before so also knows the system and how to get things done.)

That leaves two other wards, Nonsuch and Old Malden -Kingston (there being no local elections in Cuddington ward - Epson and Ewell this year). I'll start with Nonsuch. - Two of the Lib Dems who have overseen #SuttonBinShame, the Victoria house fiaso, litter piling up in residential streets, flooding under the bridge etc. etc. are asking to be given responsibility for all this again for the next four years. Are they joking? I think it's time to say good bye and get some competent people in.

Local people may remember when Eric Allen was a Conservative councillor on Nonsuch ward a few years ago. Unfortunately Eric isn't standing again in Nonsuch as he was an excellent councillor - he is standing in Cheam this time, but his wife Martina, who could arguably be even better, is. She is joined on the Conservative ticket by Peter Geiringer (who has been a councillor in Sutton for many years) and James McDermot-Hill - all of whom I know well and would recommend highly as hard working responsible candidates to represent the local area.

Also standing in Nonsuch is a chap I know quite well called Richard Johnson, standing as an independent. I tried to persuade Richard to stand as a Conservative as that would give the community the best chance of stopping the Lib Dems but he is not in the Conservative political camp but rather than joining any party is standing as an independent. For the best chance of binning the Lib Dems I would say vote for three Conservatives, but if you are not minded to support Conservatives, consider Richard as a better alternative to more Lib Dem madness. (Mind you I'd consider anyone as a better alternative to the current administration of Tweedle Lib and Tweedle Dem.)

That just brings me round to Old Malden ward in Kingston. I was very pleased to find out that my old friend Jason Hughes is standing in Old Malden. Jason used to live on the Sutton side of the bridge and I have worked with him extensively on local issues over the years. He worked as my election agent when I stood for election in Worcester park back in 2012 so he knows the area well. He recently married a Kingston girl which is why he's now on the Kingston side of the bridge but what it means is that he is ideally placed to work with councillors across the borough boundary to solve the problems that affect both sides but no one wants to take responsibility for. He brings the enthusiasm of youth with a wisdom beyond his years and I would highly recommend you put an X in his box if you have the opportunity to do so. Also standing in Old Malden in Kevin Davis, the leader of Kingston council who I am pleased to say I know reasonably well too (and has a proven track record as a very good councillor - if not borough leader). I have to say that I haven't met Nicola Sheppard, the third candidate standing with Jason and Kevin but I know that she must be good to have gotten onto the Conservative ticket there. She has been a school governor (including Chair of governors) and lived in the local area since 1996 so I'd guess she'd be a fairly safe bet for a dependable councillor - not like some of the numpties the Lib Dems seem to put up these days.

So there you have it. You have the chance to go out and put some Xs in boxes and change your local area for the better. Go for it...

Update - the next day

Well Worcester Park has turned a much bluer shade overnight I'm glad to report. Of the three wards up for election, 6 councillors had been Lib Dem (both Sutton wards of Nonsuch and Worcester Park), and the 3 in Old Malden had already been Conservative. Old Malden once again elected 3 Conservatives, Worcester Park ward (where I stood last time) elected 1 in the form of Tom Drummond but the real prize was Nonsuch ward which dumped 3 Lib Dems in favour of three Conservatives - one on the toss of a coin after several recounts found James McDermot Hill with exactly the same number of votes as Sam Bourne. It just goes to show that every vote really does count in local elections. Had a single person who voted Consevative in Nonsuch ward not done so, James would not have won - so well done Nonsuch ward!

That means the majority (7 out of 12) Worcester Park council representatives are now Conservative compared with 3 previously. It also means, particularly as the Conservatives won Stonecot ward further up London Road across to the A217 (where the big Tesco is), that the Council Local Committee is now a majority (7-2) Conservative committee (is was 9 Lib Dems before). Meaning that certain things in the area can now start to be done differently. I would encourage local people to attend the local committee meetings as they are public meetings to make sure the new councillors know what local people want.

Sunday, 5 November 2017

Hamptons Fireworks

On Tonight - The Hamptons Fireworks... Get along and enjoy!

Tuesday, 22 August 2017

Club Developing

Some of you might remember Gary Weaving as the friendly neighbourhood policeman who use to patrol the streets of Worcester Park, others may know him in his current role as head of security on the Hamptons while others still might remember him as the guy who started and ran the angling club at the Hamptons. Few through may know him as a rock singer with a record out, recorded in the 1970s and fewer still may know him as a keen local photographer!

So when he asked me to promote the Cheam Camera Club of which he a a key member I felt it only right to do so. Please see below...

It's not strictly Worcester Park but as Gary pointed out, we don't have a Worcester Park camera club (that either of us can recall) so camera wielding Worcester Parkers now have somewhere they can all congregate and bond... or perhaps that should be converge and develop...

Saturday, 1 July 2017

Another Busy Day

After last weekend with so much going on locally, who'd have though this weekend could give it a run for it's money? Well the challenge has been thrown down and this weekend is looking to have just as much on as last weekend! Enjoy!

Additionally, the Friends of Green Lane School are having a silent auction so feel free to get in contact and place your bids...

Friday, 23 June 2017

Busy Day

There is so much on tomorrow I don't know where to start! If you want to try to get to everything I wish you luck - you are a better person than me! However here are the options for you to choose from. (Thanks to Richard Johnson for sending me a few I didn't know about!) At least you won't get bored!

Saturday, 15 April 2017

Vic House Update

Well the Victoria House situation is finally getting its official public hearing this Wednesday 19th April - at the Europa Gallery in the Sutton Council offices - St Nicholas Way, Sutton SM1 1EA at 7:30PM.

See the leaflet below being distributed by the WPRA and CHAPRA.

The two residents' associations (WPRA and CHAPRA) have helped gather a total of 1423 signatures against the proposal and hopefully the Councillors on the planning committee will remember who it is they represent when it comes to making the final decision.

We know the current building is an eyesore and needs to be replaced ASAP but we don't want it replaced with something completely inappropriate, that will create more parking issues in the area and which we will be stuck with for at least another 50 years. What we want is for the council to deny planning permission for this Eyesore #2 and force the developers to come back to the table with something far more appropriate for the area. We have seen a number of acceptable designs over the years for a replacement development. It's time one of those was built - not this collection of ugly tower blocks.

Please come along to the meeting to show the planning committee the depth of local feeling over this issue.

Monday, 6 March 2017

Something New

Many blog readers have noted that I haven't posted much for a while. The reason is I've been rather busy!

Is is known to some readers that I have been an amateur musician for a while. Recently however, after constant low level encouragement I decided to take the next step and release a song. The video to go with it can be seen below. Eagle eyed viewers will note the clock on top of Maple Lodge in the Hamptons features in it!

The song is available to pre-order from iTunes and will be released properly on 22nd March.

Hopefully people will understand that doing something like this takes a lot of time and effort and in addition to raising a family, full time work, and continuing my work with the WPRA (we have been door knocking to gather signatures against the new proposals for Victoria House - over 1300 so far since you ask!) I've not had the time to research and write up posts as I would otherwise like to. And given the level of animosity towards me by a few individuals who feel I owe it to them to not only keep writing posts but to write them from a point of view they deem acceptable, I've not felt as eager to keep churning them out as I'd like to.

One of the reasons I took over the blog in early 2013 is to ensure there was a source of information about the local community and I rather liked the way the previous blogger took a slightly skewed look at things. I tried to keep it running in the same style and it was funny to note how all the comments about "how political the blog was" only came after people found out it was me running it - prior to that nobody complained , even though I'd been running it for months by then. I only decided to go public because as I was standing for council I didn't feel it was right to be blogging anonymously.

However I digress - It so happened that Richard Johnson started a Worcester Park Local Community Page a on facebook a few months ago and has been keeping local readers up to date with situations and events. I have published links to his page before and, knowing there was still a good source of local community information available, this was the other reason I wasn't so worried about turning my attention to other things for a short while.

In answer to Dave, who feels I ought to punished for my lack of posts I would say: were I an elected councillor I would have a specific responsibility to the community. Running a blog is a hobby. Yes it is useful to the community but there has never been any contract between you and me that I must write posts constantly - such a contract wouldn't hold up in law anyway as it would by totally one-sided. The obligations I have taken on board, like the WPRA and chairing the WP police safer neighbourhood team ward panel, I have continued to do - it's just that these things aren't so public.

To the person who offered to take over the blog - yes I do know who you are. Thanks for your offer however going through your comments I've noted you tend to be even more political than me, and are one of the people who have seriously exaggerated the amount of political posts on here. In reality there are very few posts on here that are political and I always offer both sides the opportunity to have their say. There are several people who tend to comment whom I strongly disagree with but I encourage them to continue commenting as their comments are intelligent and offer a different point of view. There are others who's comments are a constant steam of (often politically motivated) drivel full of venom against me and everything I do or say. It is rare that I block anyone but people like this will be blocked.

I would like to thank those who have commented in my defence. It is because of people like you that I want to continue doing this - so yes I will be doing more posting - however just for a while, it will be a little sparse.

Hope you like the song!

Saturday, 17 December 2016

Victoria House Saga Continues

As many people are now aware, new plans have been submitted for the re-development for Victoria House up at the North Cheam crossroads. When I say 'new plans', actually the proposal looks almost the same as the previous plan, which was withdrawn without explanation earlier this year. The main difference seems to be the retail units having been made a bit bigger.

So we're finally going to lose the eyesore that has blighted the crossroads for years. Yes that's one good argument. However how is the new plan going to affect the area?

The new plan - shown above right, is effectively a group of tower blocks - almost the ugliest possible design, universally known as the greatest attractor of antisocial behaviour. It doesn't fit in with the art deco design of the buildings on the other three corners of the cross roads or other buildings in the area.

Perhaps we could 'get used' to this design on our doorstep - all 10 storeys of it. But could we also get used to the over-spill of cars? This building is to have 90 residential units, a mix of 1, 2 and 3 bed-roomed affairs. How many car parking spaces would you think are needed to cater for 90 such flats? If you think fifty or less you probably don't use local public transport very much. But guess what - the answer is indeed 50! In fact it is closer to 45 as five of those spaces are for the retail units.

Now to compensate there are around 150 bicycle parking spaces. I seem to remember another recent planning application in Green Lane where we were told that 'everyone would arrive on bicycles' and so we needn't worry about the chronic shortage of parking spaces. Perhaps this plan has been put together by the same people? Just one question - are they deluded about the number of people who own/use cars (perhaps vs those who only cycle) or is this their attempt to socially engineer a little portion of North Cheam into a anti-car paradise?
PTAL map of Worcester park / North Cheam - click to enlarge

So what does it take for people to want to ditch the car?

Not very far away there are indeed areas where few people own cars. Areas where I would quite happy live without a vehicle. This area is called Central London. The reason we don't need cars there is a) the plethora of excellent public transport to get you to nearly anywhere local quickly, and b) nearly every type of shop imaginable within walking distance.

The relative convenience of public transport has all been nicely mapped out and corresponds to a number of 'PTAL values' (I promise not to get any more technical than this). There are nine values basically going from 0 (being almost nonexistent public transport) up to 6b - being transport so convenient you'd prefer it to using a car. (See the full London PTAL map here). The whole of central London is either PTAL 6a or 6b - indicating the most convenient public transport possible. Sections of Worcester Park are 0 (worst possible) most of the area is 1a (really awful) with areas mostly around main bus routes being around 2 (not quite as awful). There happen to be a couple of small islands in the area of PTAL 3 (which on an exam might almost scrape a pass). Victoria House happens to sit just inside the smallest of these.

I don't think you need to be a genius to work out that the best way to get people to use public transport is to increase the convenience of public transport to the point where it is preferable to car use. Deliberately discouraging car use by limiting car parking spaces to around half of what is needed without offering a genuine alternative is not 'visionary'. It's just stupid and will result in people looking for other places to put their cars. Those other places will be the very few spaces around North Cheam that still exist in side streets and around the shops. That means that a) other people who live in the area will have even less space for their own cars, and b) the people who currently shop in North Cheam and use their car to get there will soon realise that trying to park in North Cheam is a pointless exercise and will go elsewhere, leading to fewer customers in the shops there. This means that instead of reinvigorating North Cheam, this development will be an additional (if not final) nail in it's coffin.

A counter argument might be the parking available in the Sainsburys car park - and I'd agree that more needs to be done to let the public know that they can easily get to the North Cheam shops from here but it's not like parking just at the shop you want to visit. And it's existence hasn't been enough to make North Cheam a vibrant shopping area. Making the parking situation even worse isn't going to somehow fix the problem.

Now it's easy to say that this plan is better than the eyesore currently on the site (you may agree or disagree with this statement). However the point is, it's not merely one or the other. We have already seen a far better plan put forward for this area.

On the left here is the proposal put forward by Stonegate Homes. I personally knocked on doors with a petition in favour of this development (so this is not just a knee-jerk reaction against any local development.) Yes, this was still a tall development, and bigger than we would have liked, but it was generally in keeping with local art-deco design and crucially it had enough parking space for residents plus extra space for shoppers during the day and then for visitors in the evening. Also it wasn't a group of tower blocks. In short it would have improved the area, not diminished it.

For these reasons two local residents' associations have joined forces to fight against this latest proposal. Chapra RA (Church Hill and Priory Road Residents' Association) and the WPRA (Worcester Park Residents' Association), which I currently chair, have organised a leaflet which we are delivering to homes near the site and also a petition.

As this is a new proposal, all previous comments/objections (or letters of support) are no longer relevant and only comments specifically based on this new proposal will be taken into account by the planning department.

So if you would like to object, comment on, or even write in support of the proposal, the planning application number is A2016/75951 which can be accessed on, or by using the following direct link.

You can also write directly to:
The London Borough of Sutton Planning Division
24 Denmark Rd
Surrey SM5 2JG
Remember to quote planning number A2016/75951.

The petition is being held in Steve's Card Shop on the North West corner of the crossroads - opposite Victoria House if you'd like to go in and sign it.

We also have a small number on volunteers out delivering leaflets and also door knocking to gather petition signatures. Please contact me (Simon Densley) via the WPRA - if you'd like to join them and I'll get you some leaflets or petition sheets and allocate you some roads to do. We need to be quick though - the deadline is at the beginning of January.

We hope that with two local residents' associations working together, our combined voices will be heard loud and clear. Yes we want the existing building removed, but we want it replaced with something that will enhance the quality of the local area - not something that in 10 years time might be as hated as much as the exiting Victoria House is now.

So please make your voice heard by emailing or writing to Sutton's planning department and please feel free to get in touch to either deliver leaflets or to knock on doors to get petition signatures. And yes if you completely disagree with me about all this, that's fine - you can write in to support the application.

Hopefully though we'll get the sort of development we need at the North Cheam cross roads. We've waited many years for a proper development. I'd say a couple more years to ensure we get the right one will be worth the wait in the long run - especially when we're looking back at what we did about this particular proposal.

Thursday, 8 December 2016

Green Trees

Have you got your Christmas Tree yet? If not, this Saturday is your opportunity to both fill that gap in your life (and your lounge-room) and support a local school!

As the sign says, Green Lane Primary School will be selling trees from 10 'til 2 this Saturday (10th December). Like last year Ross Fruiterers will be supplying the trees and donating a large percentage of the profits back to the school.

As Tanya from Green Lane told the blog:
"The trees range in price from £22.50-£39.00 so come and pick yours! You can also reserve your tree by emailing The school's Christmas tree has also been kindly donated by Ross."
So you get a tree and the local kids get a better education - well that's the sort of idea anyway...

Monday, 5 December 2016

Flick O' The Switch

Sticking steadfastly to Christmas themes... The Great Hamptons Christmas Tree Light Up is taking place this Saturday (10th December) at 5:30pm at the top of the hill in the Hamptons (That's Mayflower Park to those in the know...)

This year the lights are being switched on by Paul Scully, our local MP and there will be free mince pies and mulled wine for all (wow!), sponsored by Waitrose and Ivygate, plus carols and festive music.

Everyone from the Hamptons and the whole of Worcester Park is welcome, if not out-rightly encouraged to be there.

The tree is a 25ft Norway Pine sited on the Viewing Circle at the top of Mayflower Park. When lit, it will be visible to most of Worcester Park.

Brighten up your Christmas at The Hamptons on 10th December!

Update (a week later)

Well the rain almost held out and many people turned up for the great light up.

As promised there was plenty of mulled wind, mince pies and others mini gastronomic delights to enjoy.

This year the countdown and switch on was down at Maple Lodge due to the unpredictability of the weather - which worked out well as it was close to the supply of aforementioned gastronomic delights.

Local MP Paul Scully did the honours after getting the children (with everyone joining in) to do a countdown.

The lights went on according to plan. People ooed, ahhred, clapped and made their way up to the tree which can now be seen from many parts of Worcester Park.

The Picture here on the right of the tree with the moon directly above was taken by local Hamptons photographer Michael Leonard. You can see much of his other work adorning Maple Lodge and other places including a couple of large pictures in Natwest in Central Road!